The Deeper Inquiry

193 words, about 1 minute.

The institutional corruption literature — which is distinct from the legal literature on corruption and from the organizational behavior literature on organizational deviance — examines how institutions whose formal structure and stated commitments remain intact are gradually transformed by the accumulation of decisions that individually seem reasonable but cumulatively represent a fundamental shift in institutional character. Lawrence Lessig's work on institutional corruption, particularly Republic, Lost (2011) and his earlier work on how dependence relationships corrupt institutional judgment, provides the most systematic analysis of the mechanisms through which institutional capture operates without explicit quid pro quo.

The history of captured institutions in the social movement and cooperative sector is extensively documented in specific case studies that are insufficiently aggregated into general theory. The history of the Cooperative Wholesale Society's gradual conversion from cooperative to conventional enterprise in the UK, the history of mutual insurance companies' demutualisation in the US and UK, the history of community development financial institutions' drift toward conventional banking practices — each provides specific documentation of how capture operates in institutions with explicit constitutional commitments to alternative practices. The aggregation of these cases reveals patterns that are directly relevant to Providence's anti-capture architecture.